Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in older patients with advanced gastric cancer: the Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group (TCOG) GI-1601 study.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) is a standard treatment option for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We conducted a prospective multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CapeOX as a first-line therapy for AGC in older patients. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients aged ≥ 70 years with AGC were eligible. Initial treatment comprised capecitabine (2000 mg/m2 on days 1-14) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 on day 1) every 3 weeks. After the initial feasibility assessment, the dose was reduced considering toxicity (capecitabine, 1500 mg/m2 on days 1-14; and oxaliplatin, 100 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, 108 patients were enrolled, of whom 104 were evaluated. Thirty-nine patients received the original-dose treatment, whereas 65 received the reduced-dose treatment. The median OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and time to treatment failure (TTF) were 12.9 (95% CI 11.6-14.8), 5.7 (95% CI 5.0-7.0), and 4.3 (95% CI 3.9-5.7) months, respectively, for all patients; 13.4 (95% CI 9.5-16.0), 5.8 (95% CI 4.1-7.8), and 5.3 (95% CI 3.5-7.2) months in the original-dose group; and 12.8 (95% CI 11.3-15.3), 5.7 (95% CI 4.4-7.0), and 4.1 (95% CI 3.7-5.7) months in the reduced-dose group. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (17.9%), anemia (12.8%), and thrombocytopenia (12.8%) in the original-dose group and neutropenia (13.8%) and anorexia (12.3%) in the reduced-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate CapeOX's efficacy and safety in older AGC patients.

Phase II study of biweekly cetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFIRI as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and exploratory analysis of associations between DNA methylation status and the efficacy of the anti-EGFR antibody: T-CORE1201.

Background: Little is known about the biweekly combined use of cetuximab and chemotherapy as second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Recently, DNA methylation status has been reported to be a new possible predictor of the efficacy from the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody treatment. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of biweekly cetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFIRI as a second-line treatment for KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC. We also investigated the predictability of DNA methylation status on the efficacy of the EGFR antibody-containing treatment. Methods: Patients who were refractory or intolerant to the first-line chemotherapy were enrolled and received biweekly cetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFIRI. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor evaluations were performed every 2 months using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. DNA methylation status of colorectal cancer cells was defined by a modified MethyLight assay. Results: Sixty-six cases were enrolled. The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.8-7.6] months. The median overall survival (mOS) was 12.7 (95% CI, 7.5-15.3) months. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia occurred in 53.0% of patients, whereas skin disorders with a grade 3 or higher occurred in <15% of patients. In multivariate analysis, DNA methylation status could not be an independent predictor of PFS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.43; P=0.39] and OS (HR, 2.13; P=0.086). However, in RAS/BRAF wild-type patients, the mPFS and mOS in the low-methylated colorectal cancer (LMCC) group was numerically better than those in the highly-methylated colorectal cancer (HMCC) group, although the difference was not statistically significant [mPFS: 8.5 (95% CI, 6.1-10.9) vs. 3.3 (95% CI, 1.2-not reached) months, P=0.79; ΔmPFS, 5.2 months; mOS: 15.3 (95% CI, 11.9-23.5) vs. 6.5 (95% CI, 3.1-not reached) months, P=0.53; ΔmOS, 8.8 months]. Conclusions: Biweekly cetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFIRI is a useful second-line therapy for mCRC. DNA methylation status warrants further exploration as a predictive biomarker for anti-EGFR efficacy in mCRC.

Study protocol for HGCSG1801: A multicenter, prospective, phase II trial of second-line FOLFIRI plus aflibercept in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to anti-EGFR antibodies.

Background: The first-line chemotherapy for patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) commonly involves cytotoxic regimens, such as FOLFOX and FOLFIRI, combined with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies. When progression occurs following anti-EGFR antibody-combined chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic inhibitors can be used as second-line treatment. Although randomized controlled trials have shown that anti-angiogenic inhibitors [bevacizumab, ramucirumab, and aflibercept (AFL)] carry survival benefit when combined with FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy, such trials did not provide data on patients with mCRC refractory to anti-EGFR antibody-combined chemotherapy. Therefore, our group planned a multicenter, nonrandomized, single-arm, prospective, phase II study to investigate the safety and efficacy of FOLFIRI plus AFL as a second-line chemotherapy for patients with mCRC refractory to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy combined with anti-EGFR antibodies. Methods: FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m2, l-leucovorin 200 mg/m2, bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m2, and infusional 5-FU 2400 mg/m2/46 h) and AFL (4 mg/kg) will be administered every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicities occur. The primary endpoint will be the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate, whereas the secondary endpoints will include overall survival, PFS, response rate, disease control rate, adverse events, and relative dose intensity for each drug. A sample size of 41 participants will be required. This study will be sponsored by the Non-Profit Organization Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group and will be supported by a grant from Sanofi. Discussion: There is only an observational study reporting data on FOLFIRI plus AFL for patients with mCRC who previously received anti-EGFR antibodies; therefore, a prospective clinical trial is needed. This study will prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI plus AFL in patients with mCRC who are resistant to anti-EGFR antibodies and have limited data. Moreover, this study will reveal predictive biomarkers for AFL-based chemotherapy. Clinical trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs011190006. Registered 19 November, 2019, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs011190006.

Study protocol of the HGCSG1803: a phase II multicentre, non-randomised, single-arm, prospective trial of combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, irinotecan and S-1 (OX-IRIS) as first-line treatment for metastatic or relapsed pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) has become one of the standard treatments for metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, the use of FOLFIRINOX requires prolonged infusion. Therefore, we planned to develop a new combination chemotherapy regimen with oxaliplatin, irinotecan and S-1 (OX-IRIS) for advanced pancreatic cancer. In the phase Ⅰ study that was conducted previously, the safety and recommended dose of OX-IRIS were assessed. In this study, we will evaluate the efficacy and safety of OX-IRIS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The HGCSG1803 study started as a multicentre, non-randomised, single-arm, prospective, phase II study in December 2019. Eligible subjects were patients with untreated metastatic or relapsed pancreatic cancer. OX-IRIS is administered as follows: 30 min infusion of antiemetic; 2-hour infusion of oxaliplatin (65 mg/m2); 1.5-hour infusion of irinotecan (100 mg/m2) on day 1 and 15 of each 4-week cycle; and oral S-1 (40 mg/m2) twice daily from after dinner on day one to after breakfast on day 15, followed by a 14-day rest, to be repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. The primary endpoint is response rate. The secondary endpoints are overall and progression-free survival, safety and dose for each drug. Using a binomial test, a sample size of 40 patients was set with a threshold value of 10% and expected value of 30%. Registration of 40 cases is planned from 18 institutions in Japan. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All the procedures will be conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964 and its later versions. All the patients will receive written information about the trial and will provide informed consent before enrolment. This trial was approved by the Hokkaido University Certified Review Board (approval No: 018-037). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs011190008.

Phase 3 trial of sequential versus combination treatment in colorectal cancer: The C-cubed study.

BACKGROUND: An optimal treatment strategy using oxaliplatin and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer has not been defined. We investigated whether the sequential treatment using fluoropyrimidines with bevacizumab followed by the addition of oxaliplatin at first progression was better than a combination treatment using fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin with bevacizumab. METHODS: In the sequential treatment, the escalation from fluoropyrimidines plus bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidines plus oxaliplatin with bevacizumab was recommended in case of progressive disease. Time to failure of strategy was the primary end-point, whereas the secondary end-points were overall survival, progression-free survival, overall response rate and safety. RESULTS: Three hundred patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomised to receive either the sequential treatment (n = 151) or the combination treatment (n = 149). The sequential treatment was superior to the combination treatment about time to failure of strategy (15.2 months; 95% CI, 12.5-17.2 months vs. 7.8 months: 95% CI, 6.3-9.5 months; P < 0.001). However, the median overall survival was 27.5 (95% CI, 24.4 to 32.7) months in the sequential treatment and 27.0 (95% CI, 22.8 to 36.0) months in the combination treatment (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.28; P = 0.61). The overall response rate was 33.1% in the sequential treatment arm and 51.7% in the combination treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the extension of the sequential treatment starting from fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab to selected patients who do not need an objective response to the threatening disease.

Phase II Study of Ramucirumab Plus Irinotecan Combination Therapy as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer: HGCSG1603.

BACKGROUND: Ramucirumab is a human IgG1 monoclonal vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody that inhibits tumor cell growth and affects the tumor cell microenvironment. We assessed the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus irinotecan combination therapy as second-line treatment in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory or intolerant to primary chemotherapy were included. Ramucirumab 8 mg/kg plus irinotecan 150 mg/m2 combination therapy was administered every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 6 months and secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, response rate, safety, and dose intensity for each drug. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled between January 2018 and September 2019. The progression-free survival rate at 6 months was 26.5% [95%CI, 13.2%-41.8%, P = .1353)]. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 4.2 months (95%CI, 2.5-5.4 months) and 9.6 months (95%CI, 6.4-16.6 months), respectively. The overall response rate was 25.9% (95%CI, 11.1-36.3%) and disease control rate was 85.2% (95%CI, 66.3-95.8%). Grade ≥3 adverse events that occurred in >10% of patients included neutropenia, leucopenia, anemia, anorexia, and febrile neutropenia. No death or new safety signals with a causal relation to the study treatment were observed. CONCLUSION: Although the primary endpoint was not achieved statistically, combination therapy of ramucirumab plus irinotecan showed anticancer activity and a manageable safety profile for second-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Initial Safety Analysis of CapeOx for Elderly Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients: A Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: Safety of combination chemotherapy using platinum and fluorouracil has not been evaluated adequately for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We initiated a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) as first-line therapy for patients with AGC aged ≥70 years. Planned assessment of toxicity was made upon recruitment of the first 20 patients. RESULTS: In five out of 20 patients, unacceptable toxicity was observed, including three patients who were unable to complete the initial two courses due to adverse events. Among the other 15 patients, dose reduction due to toxicity were needed in 10 and treatment delay for adverse events also occurred in 12 patients during the first two courses. CONCLUSION: Early analyses of safety suggest that the CapeOX regimen was not tolerated without dose reduction for elderly patients with AGC in this study.

Cisplatin Plus Capecitabine After Adjuvant S-1 in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Phase II T-CORE1102 Trial.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This phase II study assessed the efficacy of capecitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to adjuvant S-1. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study was conducted by Tohoku Clinical Oncology Research and Education Society (T-CORE) in Japan. Patients aged ≥20 years with advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer that was refractory to S-1 were enrolled. Patients received 80 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 intravenously and 1,000 mg/m2 capecitabine twice daily from day 1 to day 14, in 3-week cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The threshold overall response rate (ORR) was estimated to be 15%. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure, ORR, and toxicities. RESULTS: In total, 21 patients were enrolled from seven hospitals. The median patient age was 63 years. Nineteen patients received the protocol treatment. Median PFS was 3.7 months [90% confidence interval (CI)=2.7-5.6 months], which did not reach the predefined threshold of 4.0 months. ORR was 5.9% (95%CI=0.0-17.1%). Median OS was 11.9 months (95% CI 6.3-19.4 months). Febrile neutropenia was observed in 5.3% of patients. The most frequently observed grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities were nausea (15.8%) and hyponatremia (15.8%). CONCLUSION: The addition of a fluoropyrimidine to a platinum agent after adjuvant therapy is not suitable for gastric cancer.

Multicenter, prospective, observational study of chemotherapy-induced dysgeusia in gastrointestinal cancer.

PURPOSE: Dysgeusia is an adverse event caused by chemotherapy. Although retrospective studies have shown zinc administration improves dysgeusia, there have been no prospective studies. The present study examined effects of zinc therapy on dysgeusia in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled patients with dysgeusia during chemotherapy treatment. Patients received no intervention (control), polaprezinc p.o., or zinc acetate hydrate p.o., and serum zinc levels were measured at 0 (baseline), 6, and 12 weeks. Dysgeusia was assessed using CTCAE v5.0 and subjective total taste acuity (STTA) criteria using questionnaires at baseline and 12 weeks. RESULTS: From February 2020 to June 2021, 180 patients were enrolled from 17 institutes. There were no differences in mean baseline serum zinc levels among the groups (67.3, 66.6, and 67.5 µg/dL in the no intervention, polaprezinc, and zinc acetate hydrate groups, respectively. P = 0.846). The changes in mean serum zinc levels after 12 weeks were - 3.8, + 14.3, and + 46.6 µg/dL, and the efficacy rates of dysgeusia were 33.3%, 36.8%, and 34.6% using CTCAE and 33.3%, 52.6%, 32.7% using STTA in the no intervention, polaprezinc, and zinc acetate hydrate groups, respectively. The STTA scores improved in all groups, with significant improvement observed in the polaprezinc group compared with the no intervention group (P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: There was no significant correlation between the degree of serum zinc elevation and improvement in dysgeusia, suggesting that polaprezinc, but not zinc acetate hydrate, was effective in improving chemotherapy-induced dysgeusia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000039653. Date of registration: March 2, 2020.

Phase II Study of the Reuse of Trastuzumab with Docetaxel beyond Progression after First-Line Treatment in Second-Line Treatment for Unresectable, Metastatic Gastric Cancer (T-CORE1203).

Whether trastuzumab use beyond disease progression is beneficial in second-line treatment for patients with unresectable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer remains to be elucidated. We conducted this phase II study to assess whether trastuzumab plus docetaxel was effective for patients with previously treated advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. This trial was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study, conducted by Tohoku Clinical Oncology Research and Education Society (T-CORE). Patients aged 20 years or older who had advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer and were refractory to trastuzumab, fluoropyrimidine, and cisplatin were enrolled. Patients were treated with 6 mg/kg trastuzumab and 60 mg/m2 docetaxel every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. The threshold overall response rate was estimated to be at 15%. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, 6-month survival rate, overall survival, and toxicities. A total of 27 patients were enrolled from 7 hospitals. The median age was 67 years. Partial response was seen in 3 patients among the 26 evaluated patients. The overall response rate was at 11.5% (90% confidence interval 1.2%-21.8%). The median progression-free survival was 3.2 months, the 6-month survival rate was 85%, and the median overall survival was 11.6 months. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 14.8%. The most frequently observed grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity was anorexia (14.8%). The primary endpoint was not achieved. The results support a current consensus that the continuation of trastuzumab in second-line therapy for gastric cancer is not a recommended option.

The relationship between peripheral neuropathy and efficacy in second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer: a prospective observational multicenter study protocol (IVY).

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel is used in second-line conventional chemotherapies to manage patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer (GC). Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy is a known adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation. Additionally, oxaliplatin which causes irreversible peripheral neuropathy is now commonly used in first-line chemotherapy for advanced GC in Japan. Thus, examining the incidence of peripheral neuropathy with paclitaxel after oxaliplatin is necessary to improve the quality of life and outcomes of patients with advanced GC in the second-line treatment setting. METHODS: This prospective observational multicenter study, (which we named IVY study), will evaluate the degree of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced GC. A patient neurotoxicity questionnaire (PNQ) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) will be used to assess CIPN during the second-line treatment. The key eligibility criteria are as follows: 1) unresectable or recurrent GC histologically confirmed to be primary adenocarcinoma of the stomach, 2) age over 20 years, 3) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-2, 4) written informed consent following full study information is provided to the patient, 5) progression or intolerance for first-line chemotherapy comprising fluorinated pyrimidine and platinum anticancer drugs (cisplatin or oxaliplatin) for advanced GC. 6) presence of evaluable lesions as confirmed using a computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. A total of 200 patients is considered to be appropriate for inclusion in this study. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide some information on CIPN with the sequential usage of oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy to paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network's Clinical Trials Registry with the registration number UMIN000033376 (Registered 11 July 2018).

Intermittent Withdrawal of Oxaliplatin for Alleviating Neurotoxicity during Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy for Japanese Patients with Inoperable or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase 2 Multicenter Study.

Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is a well-established regimen for patients with inoperable and metastatic colorectal cancer. However, one of the major limitations of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is sensory neuropathy. It was previously reported that introduction of intermittent oxaliplatin treatment to an oxaliplatin-based regimen has a significant benefit on efficacy or safety. Here, we prospectively assessed whether efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer are achieved by introduction of withdrawal of oxaliplatin treatment for a certain period (intermittent oxaliplatin treatment). The primary endpoint of the present study is to assess the progression free survival time on patients treated with chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6 (levofolinate, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin combination therapy) plus bevacizumab or CapeOX (oxaliplatin and capecitabine combination therapy) plus bevacizumab) with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment. Bevacizumab is a humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody. Median progression-free survival by the mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment or the CapeOX plus bevacizumab with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment were 10.6 months (95% confidential interval [CI], 8.3-13.4 months) or 8.0 months (95% CI, 4.2-16.8 months), respectively. Overall response rate by the mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment or CapeOX plus bevacizumab with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment was 55.1% or 42.1%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 neuropathy was observed in 4.1% or 10.5% of patients treated with mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment or CapeOX plus bevacizumab with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment, respectively. Introduction of intermittent oxaliplatin treatment has improved severe neuropathy in mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab regimen without reducing treatment efficacy.

Randomized phase II study of cetuximab versus irinotecan and cetuximab in patients with chemo-refractory KRAS codon G13D metastatic colorectal cancer (G13D-study).

PURPOSE: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of cetuximab-based treatment in patients with chemotherapy-resistant refractory mCRC with KRAS G13D mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An assessment of the efficacy and safety of cetuximab-based treatment was performed in an observation-enriched randomized controlled study comparing the cetuximab alone group (Cet group) and the combination of cetuximab and irinotecan group (CetI group) for KRAS G13D-mutated mCRC in Japan. In this study, the patients received a biweekly (500 mg/m2 on day 1) or weekly (250 mg/m2) intravenous infusion of cetuximab in Cet group, or a biweekly (500 mg/m2 on day 1) or weekly (250 mg/m2) intravenous infusion of cetuximab followed by irinotecan (150 mg/m2) in CetI group. Propensity score adjustment was used to achieve balance in the observational arm. RESULTS: Data from a total of 29 patients (10 in Cet group, 19 in CetI group) were analyzed. Crude median progression-free survival time was 2.9 months in the Cet group and 2.5 months in the CetI group. Crude disease control rates were 55.6% in the Cet group and 47.4% in the CetI group. After a median follow-up of 43 months, the crude median overall survival was 8.0 months in the Cet group and 7.6 months in the CetI group. Cetuximab-based treatment did not markedly increase any characteristic toxicity and was generally well tolerated. Propensity score analyses adjusted for performance status and number of metastases showed comparable results with the crude results. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab-based treatment seemed to benefit patients with chemotherapy-resistant, refractory KRAS G13D-mutated mCRC. Our results might support the administration of cetuximab-based treatment for KRAS-mutant mCRC and would be able to provide treatment flexibility in this setting.

[A case of simultaneous bilateral metastatic ovarian tumor of colon cancer followed by FOLFOX4 Regimen and oral tegafur/uracil+oral leucovorin after R0 operation].

The patient was a 41-year-old female, who underwent histectomy and sdnexopexy due to perforated ovarian tumor. One month later, she was diagnosed with simultaneous bilateral metastatic ovarian tumor of colon cancer, and right hemicolectomy (D3) was performed. After surgery, the patient was treated with 10 courses of therapy with the FOLFOX4 regimen. No recurrence was recognized, and the patient was treated with 12 courses of therapy with oral tegafur/ uracil (UFT)+oral Leucovorin (LV). The patient evidenced no tumor recurrence 2 years after the initial treatment. We consider oral UFT+oral LV therapy was useful for post FOLFOX4 therapy after R0 surgery.

[Reduction of oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity by Gosha-jinki-gan].

PURPOSE: Oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil/Leucovorin (FOLFOX) has emerged as the treatment of choice for advanced-stage colorectal cancer. Sensory neurotoxicity is its dose-limiting toxicity. We decided to use Gosha-jinki-gan for prevention of oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity following the report of Fushiki et al. METHODS: The subjects were 14 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) was given intravenously as a FOLFOX4 regimen. All 14 patients received Gosha-jinki-gan every day after first oxaliplatin infusion. RESULT: 7 patients had grade 3 toxicity(neutropenia 6, thrombocytopenia 1). Sensory neuropathy occurred in 10 patients (71.4%). There was no neurotoxicity with functional impairment in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Gosha-jinki-gan seems to prevent acute oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity.